• Home
  • About
    • How Pluralistic Therapy Works
    • Introduction to Pluralistic Counselling and Psychotherapy
    • Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) on the pluralistic approach
    • Writing a Blog for Pluralistic Practice
  • Training
    • Degree Courses
    • Master’s Courses
    • Doctoral Courses
  • Research
    • Research Initiatives
    • Evidence to Support Pluralistic Practice
    • Research News
  • Publications
  • Tools and Measures
  • Videos
  • Events
    • Network Meetings
    • Pluralistic Conference 2020
    • Past Networking Events
  • Blog

Pluralistic Practice

Celebrating diversity in therapy

  • Home
  • About
    • How Pluralistic Therapy Works
    • Introduction to Pluralistic Counselling and Psychotherapy
    • Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) on the pluralistic approach
    • Writing a Blog for Pluralistic Practice
  • Training
    • Degree Courses
    • Master’s Courses
    • Doctoral Courses
  • Research
    • Research Initiatives
    • Evidence to Support Pluralistic Practice
    • Research News
  • Publications
  • Tools and Measures
  • Videos
  • Events
    • Network Meetings
    • Pluralistic Conference 2020
    • Past Networking Events
  • Blog

The pluralistic framework builds on pre-existing integrative approaches

March 7, 2019 Philosophy Therapeutic approaches No Comments
Facebook0Tweet0Pin0

By John Mcleod

The pluralistic model can be viewed as a kind of meta-perspective or meta-theory. There already exist many therapy theories/approaches (e.g., CBT, psychodynamic, person-centred, etc). A pluralistic framework offers a navigation system for finding a way through these existing models. For anyone new to pluralistic practice, it can be useful to think about what kind of navigation system you already had, based on your previous training and experience, and how a pluralistic system either built on that or was in conflict with it.

The main strategies used by therapists for integrating theories, ideas, interventions, etc from different sources, tend to be either personal intuition and/or some kind of assessment of client need. Other integrative strategies that exist in the broader professional literature are based on: using different skills/interventions at different stages of therapy (e.g., like the Egan model); developing a new theoretical model that incorporated bits of other models (Emotion Focused Therapy is an example of that, but quite a lot of therapists also seem to have evolved their own personal integrative theories); or being explicitly guided by what the research evidence suggests is best for each client.

I think that it is really important, if you are moving in the direction of pluralism, to be aware of your pre-existing approach to combining therapy ideas/interventions. Basically, a pluralistic approach builds on any of the previous approaches outlined in the previous paragraph, but adds in the key ingredient of sharing this knowledge with the client, in a way that takes account of the client’s own ideas and opens up a process of shared decision-making. To be able to do this, you need to be able to articulate and explain your own position. If you are unable or unwilling to ‘show your workings’ then the client cannot see where you are coming from, and there is a risk that you will be seen by the client as operating from a dominant ‘expert’ position that leaves little space for their active involvement in shared decision-making. For example, if you come up with some ideas about how therapy should proceed, by assessing client need, it is surely useful to check out with a client whether your analysis of their needs (and the proposed remedies) make sense to them.

John McLeod
February 2019

Facebook0Tweet0Pin0

PPN workshop January 2019

Meta-theories

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Blog Post Categories

  • Arts therapies (11)
  • CBT (1)
  • Children (1)
  • Co-production (3)
  • CPD (2)
  • Critiques (5)
  • Cultural diversity (3)
  • Cultural resources (6)
  • Deliberate practice (2)
  • Epistemology (1)
  • Gender (1)
  • Goals (3)
  • Groups (4)
  • Information and Updates (13)
  • Inner plurality (1)
  • Integrative and Eclectic Practices (1)
  • Leadership (2)
  • Measures (1)
  • Networking (2)
  • Older adults (1)
  • Online (4)
  • Person-centred (8)
  • Personal (22)
  • Philosophy (15)
  • Policy (2)
  • Politics (5)
  • Practice (30)
  • Preferences (11)
  • Research (10)
  • Shared decision making (15)
  • Spirituality (1)
  • Strengths and Resources (2)
  • Supervision (2)
  • Therapeutic approaches (8)
  • Training (17)
  • Young people (2)

Recent Posts

  • Creativity Gathering 27th March 2021: Storytelling April 9, 2021
  • Do Clients Want What They Want? Understanding Preferences Through the Directional Framework April 8, 2021
  • Reflections on Using the Cooper-Norcross Inventory of Preferences (C-NIP): Confronting Early Dropout April 1, 2021
  • 2021 Conference Announcement – Save the Date! March 29, 2021
  • Emotioncubes: A New Psychotherapy Tool March 26, 2021
  • Working Pluralistically with Parts of Self: The Principles of Inner Pluralism March 24, 2021
  • The Creativity Gathering March 24, 2021
  • Pluralistic Practitioners Network: Creativity and Challenge February 5, 2021
  • Pluralistic Practitioners Network: Creativity and Storytelling Gathering January 18, 2021
  • The Strength that We Find in Our New Everyday January 5, 2021

Subscribe to this Blog via Email

* indicates required
Proudly powered by WordPress | Theme: Doo by ThemeVS.