• Home
  • About
    • How Pluralistic Therapy Works
    • Introduction to Pluralistic Counselling and Psychotherapy
    • Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) on the pluralistic approach
    • Writing a Blog for Pluralistic Practice
  • Training
    • Degree Courses
    • Master’s Courses
    • Doctoral Courses
  • Research
    • Research Initiatives
    • Evidence to Support Pluralistic Practice
    • Research News
  • Publications
  • Tools and Measures
  • Videos
  • Events
    • Network Meetings
    • Pluralistic Conference 2020
    • Past Networking Events
  • Blog

Pluralistic Practice

Celebrating diversity in therapy

  • Home
  • About
    • How Pluralistic Therapy Works
    • Introduction to Pluralistic Counselling and Psychotherapy
    • Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) on the pluralistic approach
    • Writing a Blog for Pluralistic Practice
  • Training
    • Degree Courses
    • Master’s Courses
    • Doctoral Courses
  • Research
    • Research Initiatives
    • Evidence to Support Pluralistic Practice
    • Research News
  • Publications
  • Tools and Measures
  • Videos
  • Events
    • Network Meetings
    • Pluralistic Conference 2020
    • Past Networking Events
  • Blog
Stack of journals

Philosophical Foundations of Pluralism

February 19, 2020 Philosophy 2 Comments
Facebook0Tweet0Pin0

Mick Cooper, Professor of Counselling Psychology, University of Roehampton

The recent critique of pluralistic therapy by Ong et al. (2020) has made me think that it might be useful to try and unpack further the philosophical roots of the approach, at least as I see it. John (McLeod) always used to say that one of the (relatively) unique things about the pluralistic approach is that it is founded in a philosophical standpoint, and I think it is really difficult to understand where pluralism is trying to come from without grasping those foundations.

For me, the fundamental grounds for the pluralistic approach lie in an ethics of care. This is particularly informed by the work of the French philosopher Emmanuel Levinas. For Levinas, the fundamental philosophical question is not ‘What is truth?’ or ‘What is existence?’ but how can we relate to each other in caring and respectful ways: open and welcoming to the otherness of the Other. That’s, in many ways, an incredibly radical position. So Levinas is saying that we need to start questioning by asking how can we do good to the Other. Even before we ask about right or wrong or truth or falsities.

I love that. Why? Because I think that question of how we act towards each other in caring ways is the most important question, and should be where thinking starts. What good are truths, for instance, if they lead to hurt or destruction of others–like the atomic bomb, or like the way that the Nazis mechanised the death process at Auschwitz. Do we want to develop knowledge and understanding regardless of the social consequences? That sense of care, for me, needs to guide everything, to always underpin our questioning.

Out of that foundation of care, for me, emerges a pluralistic ‘epistemology’. This is a respect for the many different ways in which the world can be seen. To not foreclose on the question of ‘What is true?’ but to value and attend to multiple understandings. This is about prizing diversity and differences, to not fall into the arrogance of thinking we have the right answer. To treasure and welcome multiple views. But, note, this pluralistic perspective is not simply an epistemic uncertainty or a failure to commit to any one perspective. It’s there as a way of actualising that value of care. For me, it means nothing without that foundation. Note, also, that this isn’t a pluralism ‘all the way down’, a foundational pluralism. Rather, it’s a pluralism which is based on a specific value: a valuing of others and how they see the world and a desire to engage with others in respectful and empowering ways.

What is the nature of a human being, or human being? From this pluralistic standpoint, there is a desire to hold open that ‘ontological’ question and not to come to any one fixed answer. Perhaps we can see human being as a seed which grows and actualises its potential. Perhaps we can see human being as a flow of existence in the face of limitations. Perhaps we can see human being as ridden in conflict with itself. A pluralistic perspective strives to understand and respect these different perspectives, it may align or favour particular interpretations, it may even passionately advocate one understanding–but its ultimate commitment is always to leaving open room for otherness: to other understandings, perspectives, possibilities. It comes back to ethics. Close on understandings and you shut a door on the Other. You exclude them.

I’m sure there are other perspectives on this, other answers to the question of pluralism’s philosophical basis. It’s something that, like many other areas, it would be great to explore further. And clarifying these foundations may help us in dialogue with other approaches. For instance, it would be interesting to compare these foundations with those that Ong et al.’s (2020) see as the basis for person-centred therapy. Maybe that is where we can find both differences and similarities.

Facebook0Tweet0Pin0

Glasgow Networking Meeting

Finding Myself Coming Back Again

2 thoughts on “Philosophical Foundations of Pluralism”

  1. Paula
    February 19, 2020 at 12:32 pm

    I guess it’s about leaving a door open? With a big welcome sign on it… Welcome to the pluralistic space, or welcome to the person centred room. We all subscribe to something, share similar ideas and values. Keep the door open and meet us in the lobby to exchange and share our way or our being.

    Reply
  2. Mark Tolan
    February 25, 2020 at 11:18 am

    The attempt of setting the foundations of Pluralistic C&P on such an explicit philosophical footing, as the work of Levinas, has always been for me, both thought provoking and divergent. As a result, I think it is enevitable that criticism will follow. Probably because the foundation is not yet fully set. This seems intentional on the one hand, so as to remain “open” in the pluralistic sense and is an obvious strength by way of assimilating the latest findings and effective modes of therapy. However, on the other hand, the 2011 explanation has never seemed to be fully adequate and therefore has always (for me) required further exploration. Cooper’s short blog here seems clearer to me in this regard, but the call for active engagement in that exploration is also called for. Engagement, however, could be perilous. The complexity of Levinas’ work (and one cannot speak of Levinas without speaking at length of Heidegger) leaves one open to intellectual elitism. In other words, how can I (we) argue on such lofty subjects with authority or without the proper academic credentials (e.g. a PhD in philosophy)? Perhaps, in a setting that respects the thoughts and words of the (therapist) Other, we might thread such a path. And perhaps a future Pluralistic Conference may allow such an exploration in the form of a symposium. Anyway, told you it was thought-provoking!

    Reply
Leave a Reply to Paula Cancel reply

Blog Post Categories

  • Arts therapies (8)
  • CBT (1)
  • Children (1)
  • Co-production (3)
  • CPD (2)
  • Critiques (5)
  • Cultural diversity (3)
  • Cultural resources (5)
  • Deliberate practice (2)
  • Epistemology (1)
  • Gender (1)
  • Goals (3)
  • groups (3)
  • Information and Updates (11)
  • Integrative and Eclectic Practices (1)
  • Leadership (2)
  • Networking (1)
  • No Category (2)
  • Older adults (1)
  • Online (1)
  • Person-centred (6)
  • Personal (21)
  • Philosophy (14)
  • Policy (2)
  • Politics (5)
  • Practice (25)
  • Preferences (10)
  • Research (9)
  • Shared decision making (12)
  • Spirituality (1)
  • Strengths and Resources (1)
  • Supervision (2)
  • Therapeutic approaches (7)
  • Training (17)
  • Young people (2)

Recent Posts

  • Pluralistic Practitioners Network: Creativity and Challenge February 5, 2021
  • Pluralistic Practitioners Network: Creativity and Storytelling Gathering January 18, 2021
  • The Strength that We Find in Our New Everyday January 5, 2021
  • Survey of Pluralistic Practice: Key Findings December 17, 2020
  • Pluralistic Therapy Cards: Playing with Potential November 26, 2020
  • Personal and Professional Development Groups in Counselling and Psychotherapy Training: A Pluralistic Perspective November 23, 2020
  • Focus: Finding my Strengths in Pluralistic Practice October 30, 2020
  • How Do You Ask Clients About Their Preferences? October 19, 2020
  • Metamodernism and Pluralism October 9, 2020
  • Pluralistic Practice Network: Creativity and Storytelling Gathering October 7, 2020

Subscribe to this Blog via Email

* indicates required
Proudly powered by WordPress | Theme: Doo by ThemeVS.